.

Monday, March 4, 2019

Ethics and Islam Essay

The interpretation of blue vs. sacred ethical motive is eternally elicit, when we try to understand which of the two deserve our support. Obviously, both good philosophies chip in the right to exist among us, just the pro good deals of the religious morals in Said Nursis vision are not only unique, but are sometimes surprising, and are sometimes unacceptable to those, who keep to secular ethical traditions. Said Nursi insists on ethics having religious foundations. His ethical vision is based on the assumption that religion is the source of reliable ethical knowledge.For Nursi, the ultimate source of all ethical reflection is the Quran (Markham 69). In this spotlight it is possible to suggest that Quran should be simple and understandable to the common people, so that they should be able to follow its provisions. The assumption is rather debatable on the one hand, there seems to be nothing negative or gruelling in the detail that Said Nursi keeps to religious foundations o f ethics. On the some other hand, I may suggest that those who refuse to accept the life of the prophet Muhammad as the source of ethical knowledge, risk facing opposition from religious ethics supporters.This ethics loses its relevance as soon as it is faced with the fact that there are possible other sources of ethics in other cultures of the world. Moreover, and I would agree with Markham, in that there is no guarantee that world obedient to Quran performer seeing its wisdom in case we do not understand the provisions to which we should keep in our ethics, it loses its relevance and meaning. The heavy side of religious ethics in Said Nursis run-in is in accepting violence as weakness in attempt to resolve various disputes.Nursi is committed to handling disagreement with peaceful means not because he shared a western skepticism active the truth of religion, but because of the truth of religion (Markham 72). Secular ethics would advantageously reject these religious attitud es. While Nursi tries to justify the strength of religion, he obviously forgets that this strength is relevant only within the limited religious circles. Secularism exists and cannot be denied. For those who consider themselves being secular the strength of religion is closely machine-accessible with the power of metaphysical phenomenon.In the absence of the latter, the power of the former becomes debatable. Thus, religious foundations of ethics can be applied within the limited shoes of extremely religious eastern countries, which keep to Islamic religion. Especially arouseing is Nursis ideas about personal ethics and social equality. His interpretation of a person in illness is rather curious, though is also internal within the eastern religious framework. O ill person who lacks application Be patient, indeed, offer thanks Your illness may transform apiece of the minutes of your life into the equivalent of an hours worship (Makrham 74).The head is whether patience is equal to inactivity. Recognizing the religious value of pain and suffering is what Nursi seek to convey in his ethical teaching (Markham 75) but this also risks confound ethics with religion, without creating any distinct border between them. Social ethics in Nursis vision tends to support equality through rejecting busy and recognizing the importance of redistribution. In these terms, Nursi seems to reject the pluralism of social status in the society. Moreover, rejection of interest is closer to rejecting secularism, than to supporting religious foundations of ethics.Conclusion The whole ethical hypothesis created by Nursi deserves attention but seems to be founded on the grounds, which do not justify the strength of religion but better protect it from the incumbrance of the external knowledge. In this light religious ethics seems even much vulnerable, than Nursi tried to represent it.Works citedMarkham, I. Secular or Religious Foundations for moral philosophy A Case Study of Be diuzzaman Said Nursi. In I. Markham & I. Ozdemir, Globalization, Ethics and Islam, Ashgate Publishing, 2005, pp. 65-78.

No comments:

Post a Comment