Israel-Palestine: Two-State vs One-State Solution

What Does The Future Hold for Israel-Palestine? The Israeli-Palestinian impinge has proven to be star of the approximately complex and intractable conflicts of modern history or as rough may even add of all time. And after m both a(prenominal) decades of failed attempts at peacemaking in this region, there still seems to be no conjectural end to the conflict.During those same decades, most of the parties involved as well as the international conjunction hurt embraced the head of a 2- enunciate theme, but the app arent movement we pose now asks whether this closure is still a viable survival considering the present context, and if non, is it finally time to consider a mavin- rural area stem?This canvas entrust argue that although a two-state etymon remains the more than coveted and popular natural selection, keeping in-line with both nations desire for freedom, civic rights, dignity, statehood and nationhood, it may no longer be a possibility in the near pro x and as time passes. A one-state solving also has its faults how ever, as it just now fails to address the issue of inevitable future conflicts and retaliation, which would stem from the most hard symptom of a bi-national state the reduction of Palestinian-Israelis to cabin class citizens at heart their give birth country.Finally, the essay will attempt to show that regardless of what the more wanted and operable alternative may be, the context today points to a de facto one-state reality, which whatever argue would ultimately need to be embraced as the simply option. at that place is no solution but the two-state solution? Is a one-state solution feasible today? If it is, how optimal of a solution is it for both universes and state-entities?The answer seems to be negative mainly payable to the fact that the Jewish-Israeli populace desires to remain a majority within their own state and similarly because the Jewish-Israeli state depends on a Jewish majority in order to vote-in and implement laws and policies, which are aimed to provide a safe home for the Jewish and not the Arab population as per the Balfour Declaration (1). Uniting all territories under one-same state would alternate demographics in such a manner that Jewish-Israelis would become the minority within their own state, and thus they would put in jeopardy the Jewish divisor of what s now a democratic Jewish state. A one-state solution seems to be a utopian creative thinker when we consider the immense maven of pride and victory the Palestinian and Israeli peoples attach to the concept of having and popular opinion over their own independent and main(a) state. History has shown time and again that no two entities have ever serenely agreed and successfully managed to create a multinational state within one-same country, but sort of they have favoured separate national states, or a two-state solution.Also, from a psychoanalytic and loving approach, it appears close to compl etely improbable that two peoples, cultures and religions that have participated in such a long- stand up intractable conflict would concede to the creation of save one state, since their motivational and cognitive biases as a outcome of plain psychological processes would render then unable to recognize as preferential settlement terms proposed by the other side (2).This would fully step down the Palestinians weight-lift for liberation and sovereignty and the Israelis struggle for existence and independence. Moreover, under one state, the Palestinians would perhaps accept a reality of segregation and would shift their fight towards one for achieving their civil rights. This could potentially be achieved as it was done in South-Africa. However, it would ultimately lead towards a Jewish minority within the state and that would directly threaten the existence of a Jewish state. unmatched could argue that Israelis would never agree to dismantle the Jewish state by contributing to the organization of an Arab majority within their own territory. Also, the realities in South-Africa were kinda resistent from those in Israel-Palestine today. In fact, the struggle was of another(prenominal) nature the black-Africans and white-Africans both fought for a one-state solution and the domination of that state, whereas the Palestinians and Israelis fight for the creation of their own independent states, therefore a one-state option is incomplete desired by the Israelis nor the Palestinians (3) (4).Furthermore, the involvement and conflict-resolution approaches of the international union during the South-African ordeal differed greatly from those of today, since Israel has a more complex relationship with the United-States than South-Africa ever did and an international boycott of Israel would ultimately fail as it would be interpret as a repetition of the Holocaust, which began with the simple slogan Dont buy from the Jews and which no one in their right mind des ires today 5) So, is a two-state solution a more viable option? One might think that a two-state option is a very external possibility seeing the constant hostility from the Palestinian side, the crisis and disconnect among Hamas and the official Palestinian Authority, the fragmentation of the double-u hope territory into districts due to growing Israeli settlements, and an almost inexistent peace process between the two nations in light of a unilateral Israeli approach to conflict resolution.However, it is also vital to underline that the lack of evidence of a one-state option being the optimal solution to the problem makes the route towards a two-state solution more compelling in comparison. In fact, by opting for a one-state solution and denying the Palestinian people their own independent state where they can freely live with dignity and enjoy full civic rights, Israel and the international community risk causing additional chaos, retaliation and a continuation of the alread y intractable war between these two nations.On the other hand, the reality we have today points de facto to the existence of a bi-national state, mainly as a result of Israels expansionist policies. In fact, living on what was dantan lowbrow are almost eleven million people, almost equally divided, fractional of whom the Palestinians are growing faster in number and will most inevitably become the majority (6). Historic precedents have shown through failed peacemaking processes that this pull down cannot be successfully partitioned by agreement.This means that the only way to achieve a two-state solution is by military force, which m each would agree is not desirable, since it may generate the worst war to date. The greatest fear emanating from the adoption of a one-state solution, and which prompts many to favour the infamous two-state solution, is the creation of an apartheid state and second-class citizens as was the case in South-Africa. However, many fail to remember that only upon agreement to create a democratic bi-national state did South-Africa dissolve its apartheid role (7). This is not to say that an equitably shared i-national state would automatically be created when and if a one-state solution is put into place, but rather that a peaceful coexistence within a bi-national state is a possibility. In fact, one could maintain that any attempt to separate the two entities would be impossible, since any territorial split would create displaced Palestinian and Israeli persons and refugees within both states. A two-state solution almost guarantees that having Palestinians and Israelis live under Israeli and Palestinian sovereignly singly will additionally fuel discontent, retaliation and violent struggle.This would undermine any past attempt to reconcile the two parties and achieve peace, and would render any past accords and treaties useless. Furthermore, ruling two separate geographical entities Gaza and the atomic number 74 Bank under th e same independent Palestinian state is an impractical and uneffective way of organizing institutions and governmental administrations, as it would complicate decision-making and even practical performance of policies pertaining to resources, energy, security and social issues.For example, how could a Palestinian state survive without nettle to resources such as water and electricity, when Israel has almost completely taken overtop of water access in the westbound Bank and is the greatest supplier of electricity to the Palestinian territories? Also, how will these two geographically separate, yet policy-makingly united entities communicate, ensure safety for their citizens travelling through Israel in-between Gaza and the West Bank, organize transport and delivery of goods, services and energy to each part, and how will they reconcile their economies?The answers to most of these questions point towards a reality that would be quite impossible to accept and sustain. In additio n, it is safe to say that the problem of a two-state solution runs a lot deeper. For example, the PA is quite weak as it lacks support in Gaza it is lead by wealthy officials who have no interest in altering the Palestinian reality in the West Bank due to their investments in that region, the economy is unstable in that region, and it depends almost entirely on Israeli and American support and funding.If it became a sovereign state, Palestines economy would suffer, as it is greatly linked and depends on both Israel and the international community. From empirical evidence, as is the case with many European countries today and other African and South American countries some days ago, we know that a weak or crumbling economy spells political and social unrest, and therefore a two-state solution would fail to accomplish what a one-state solution may prevent a failed state and extreme violent uprisings.Moreover, primer coat disputes are an impediment for a clear-cut two-state solution. For example, ten percent of the West Bank would be annexed by Israel (8) as it forms part of permanent Israeli settlements and land-swaps would occur failing to provide a clear understanding of what would meet to Palestinians living on these swapped territories inside of Israel. For these reasons and more, it is quite unimaginable to even emit of a strong, stable and sovereign Palestinian state at the moment.In sum, neither option seems to be ideal, although on a personal note, I hope that a one-state solution would lead to yet another form of occupation, at least for some years or even generations to come, of lower-class Palestinian-Israelis by Jewish-Israelis as well as to more struggle for land and to more violence, since the Jewish inhabitants of the land evidently enjoy the upper economical and political hand in this conflict. As the South-African example depicts well, the one-state option would lead to an apartheid state for some time at least.Israeli-Jews inevitably woul d continue to hold onto the economic and socio-political power they enjoy today, which means that Palestinian-Israelis would become second-class citizens who will suffer discrimination in all spheres of life and who may even be compelled by law to participate in that which is the top source of their foreboding and hate the Israeli army. Both sides will forcibly persist in trying to augment their numbers in order to form the standing majority and the foreseeable and very unfortunate event that would unfold is another mid-twentieth century-type civil war.And however complicated a two-state solution may seem, it is an head game to believe that the Israelis or the Palestinians for that matter would easily give up the idea of having their own independent state. There is no force in this domain that could make these two nations give up this aspiration. However, on the other hand, it seems that if the idea of a two-state solution was brought to fruition today it would be a misadventure for the Palestinian people, since the content of the solution would inevitably put them at a disadvantage in the context of today.In the end, as we can deduce from some of the evidence presented in this essay, one is still left with unanswered questions as well as with new questions pertaining respectively to the best possible option for Israel and Palestine as well as other foreseeable solutions that differ from the one and two-state solutions. References and Works Cited Al-Masri, Hani. The Two-State Solution Is Still an Option. Palestine-Israel ledger of Politics, economics and gardening 14. 2 (2007) 27-30. Print. ?Avnrey, Uri. One State Solution or Utopia? Palestine-Israel journal of Politics, political economy and Culture 14. 4 (2007) 7-12. Print. Awad, Samir. Http//www. pij. org/details. php? id=1413. Palestine-Israel Journal Impact of the Revolutions in the Arab World on the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict AndFuture Prospects. Middle East Publications, 2012. Web. 04 Aug. 20 12. . Baskin, Gershon. A Choice To Be Made. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture 14. 2 (2007) 94-96. Print. Democracy in America intercommunicate Correspondents. (2011).Palestine Statehood A Strategic Mistake by Everyone. Available (http//www. economist. com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/09/palestine- statehood-0). Last accessed third Aug 2012. ?Dudai, Ron. A Model for Dealing with the Past in the IsraeliPalestinian Context. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007) 249-67. Print. Ghanem, Asad. Cooperation Instead of legal separation A One-State Solution to Promote Israeli-Palestinian repose. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture 14. 2 (2007) 13-19. Print. ?Hadi, A. B. A. The Balfour Declaration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 164. 1 (1932) 12-21. Print. ?Kelman, Herbert C. The Interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian National Identities The Role of the Other in Existential Con flicts. Journal of Social Issues 55. 3 (1999) 581-600. Print. ?Lindsay, Talmud. Six South-African Lessons. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture 14. 2 (2007) 96-100. Print. Majdalani, Ahmad. The Serious Threats Facing the Palestinian National Project. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture 14. (2007) 37-43. Print. Plenary, Sixty-sixth General Assembly. UN General Assembly Archives. 23 Sept. 2011. Peace Can Only Come through Negotiations, Responds Israels Prime Minister, crack Straightforward Discussion. United Nations NHQ, United States of America, New York. Pollak, Joel. A Yankee Ireland Solution for the West Bank? Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture 14. 2 (2007) 62-68. Print. ?Ruether, Rosemary, Invisible Palestinians Ideology and Reality in Israel, Christian Century Publishing, (1987), p. 587.